<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hedge Fund Law Blog &#187; Legal Resources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/category/legal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com</link>
	<description>Blogging on hedge fund laws, starting a hedge fund, news and events...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:23:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NASAA Examination of IA Compliance Deficiencies</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/nasaa-examination-of-ia-compliance-deficiencies.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/nasaa-examination-of-ia-compliance-deficiencies.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hedge Fund Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IA compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ia exam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment adviser best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment adviser compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/?p=5531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Examination Reveals Compliance Focus Areas NASAA, the lobbying body of the various state securities divisions, recently released a set of examination findings which describe the common compliance deficiency areas for IA firms registered with the state securities commissions.  The exams, which were completed by state administrators, showcase a number of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Examination Reveals Compliance Focus Areas</strong></p>
<p>NASAA, the lobbying body of the various state securities divisions, recently released a set of examination findings which describe the common compliance deficiency areas for IA firms registered with the state securities commissions.  The exams, which were completed by state administrators, showcase a number of compliance issues for both registered investment advisers and fund managers.  According to the <a title="NASAA press release" href="http://www.nasaa.org/6156/coordinated-state-exams-identify-top-investment-adviser-deficiencies/" target="_blank">NASAA press release</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Examinations of 825 investment advisers conducted between January 1, 2011 and June 30, 2011 uncovered 3,543 deficiencies in 13 compliance areas, compared to 1,887 deficiencies in 13 compliance areas identified in a similar 2009 coordinated examination of 458 investment advisers.</p></blockquote>
<p>Below we have summarized the findings released in the <a href="http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/2011_IA_Coordinated_Examinations.ppt">NASAA 2011 Examinations Findings (.ppt)</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Deficiency Categories</strong></p>
<p>Below are the categories which were covered, along with the percentages of advisers with at least one deficiency in such category:</p>
<ul>
<li>Registration (59.9%)</li>
<li>Books and Records (45%)</li>
<li>Unethical Business Practices (36.8%)</li>
<li>Supervisory/Compliance (30.2%)</li>
<li>Advertising (21.6%)</li>
<li>Privacy (21.2%)</li>
<li>Financials (19.8%)</li>
<li>Fees (19.4%)</li>
<li>Custody (12.6%)</li>
<li>Investment Activities (3.9%)</li>
<li>Solicitors</li>
<li>Pooled Investment Vehicles (Hedge Fund)</li>
<li>Performance Reporting</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Discussion of Deficiencies</strong></p>
<p>There are a number of slides devoted to providing more granular information on the various deficiencies.  Below are some of my thoughts when I read through these deficiencies:</p>
<ul>
<li>Properly completing ADV, including proper descriptions (AUM, fees, business overview, disclosures) and making sure there are no inconsistencies; unregistered IAs were not a large part of the deficiencies.</li>
<li><a title="investment adviser books and records" href="http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/hedge-fund-books-and-records-requirement.html" target="_blank">Investment adviser books and records</a> are what you would expect – a number of different items were not properly kept as required by regulations. Surprisingly, it seems that many IAs do not keep the suitability information on their clients as required.</li>
<li>Under unethical practices, it seems that many of the deficiencies were likely caused by careless drafting of contract documents. Non-contract unethical business practices revolved around advertising and conflicts of the IA.</li>
<li>One interesting note for Supervisory/Compliance is that a large number of IAs did not follow their own internal procedures. This might be worse than having inadequate procedures – if your compliance manual says you will do something, you should make sure it is being done.</li>
<li>Financials might be what you would expect – issues with respect to net worth of the IA, bond issues and inaccurate financials.</li>
<li>Advertising deficiencies focused on website issues. I would expect this to increase in the future as more IAs establish websites in the future. Additionally, social media deficiencies are likely to increase in the future as more firms use these tools to advertise their business. [Note: while the managed futures industry has different regulations, the concepts of <a title="social media regulations" href="http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/social-media-regulation-managed-futures-industry.html" target="_blank">social media regulation</a> for the futures industry can be applied to securities compliance.]</li>
<li>Custody is probably the single most misunderstood concept for IA firms. Most people view custody to be having physical possession of a client&#8217;s cash or securities.  However, if you directly deduct a fee from a client account (even if this is done by the custodian, i.e. Schwab) then in most states the IA is deemed to have “custody” of the account and must adhere to the custody requirements of the state.</li>
<li>It is interesting to note that with respect to investment activities the following were some common deficiencies: preferential treatment (I assume, without disclosure), aggregate trades, and <a title="hedge fund soft dollars" href="http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/hedge-fund-soft-dollars-permitted-soft-dollar-practices.html" target="_blank">soft dollars</a>.</li>
<li>Solicitors have become a more prevalent issue over the last few months as more fund managers (who are RIAs) offer separately managed account programs. [Note: we will have more articles forthcoming on this issue shortly.] For solicitor issues the big items were undisclosed solicitors and issues with disclosure. Also, the agreement between the IA and the solicitor was a common deficiency.</li>
<li>Hedge fund managers with no separately managed account business had many more deficiencies than IA only firms. Deficiencies with respect to hedge funds related to valuation, cross-trading and preferential treatment (again, we assume, without disclosure).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>IA Compliance Best Practices</strong></p>
<p>As a result of the report, the NASAA identified the following as best practices for IAs:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Review and revise Form ADV and disclosure brochure annually to reflect current and accurate information.</li>
<li>Review and update all contracts.</li>
<li>Prepare and maintain all required records, including financial records.</li>
<li>Back-up electronic data and protect records.</li>
<li>Document all forwarded checks.</li>
<li>Prepare and maintain client profiles.</li>
<li>Prepare a written compliance and supervisory procedures manual relevant to the type of business to include business continuity plan.</li>
<li>Prepare and distribute a privacy policy initially and annually.</li>
<li>Keep accurate financials. File timely with the jurisdiction.</li>
<li>Maintain surety bond if required.</li>
<li>Calculate and document fees correctly in accordance with contracts and ADV.</li>
<li>Review all advertisements, including website and performance advertising, for accuracy.</li>
<li>Implement appropriate custody safeguards, if applicable.</li>
<li>Review solicitor agreements, disclosure, and delivery procedures.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>It is clear that NASAA is trying to be more of an influence on how the state administrators conduct examinations and the focus areas of those examinations.  While it is helpful for NASAA to release <a title="investment adviser compliance" href="http://www.gordiancompliance.com" target="_blank">investment adviser compliance</a> best practices, it would be more useful if they released more robust compliance materials such as sample compliance manuals/ policies and clearer guidance on state interpretations of regulations.  As Congress and the SEC determine whether to establish an <a title="investment adviser SRO" href="http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/gao-report-on-sro-for-private-fund-advisers.html" target="_blank">investment adviser SRO</a>, we are likely to see NASAA take a larger thought leadership role.  In any event, investment advisers and hedge fund managers should begin to start thinking about registration and implementing robust compliance policies and procedures which address all parts of state or SEC IA registration regulations.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>Cole-Frieman &amp; Mallon LLP provides legal advice to <a title="starting a hedge fund" href="http://www.colefrieman.com">hedge fund start ups</a> and well as established fund complexes.  Bart Mallon can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/nasaa-examination-of-ia-compliance-deficiencies.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEC Announces Open Meeting on Hedge Fund Regulations</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/sec-announces-open-meeting-on-hedge-fund-regulations.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/sec-announces-open-meeting-on-hedge-fund-regulations.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hedge Fund Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investment Advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ia registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC registration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/?p=4513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEC Considers Whether to Adopt Registration Requirement Yesterday the SEC announced that they will conduct an Open Meeting on June 22 to determine whether to adopt the new hedge fund registration requirements and related rules. At the Open Meeting the SEC is expected to delay implementation of the regulations until [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SEC Considers Whether to Adopt Registration Requirement</strong></p>
<p>Yesterday the SEC announced that they will conduct an Open Meeting on June 22 to determine whether to adopt the new hedge fund registration requirements and related rules.  At the Open Meeting the SEC is expected to delay implementation of the regulations until next year.   While the <a href="http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/sec-may-extend-ia-registration-deadline.html" target="_blank">SEC announced in a letter</a> to NASAA that they would likely extend the registration deadline, there has been no official action on this issue.  This has left managers (and lawyers and compliance personnel) unsure of how to proceed.  We will know more after the June 22 meeting.</p>
<p>The notice of the Open Meeting, reprinted below in full, can be found <a href="http://sec.gov/news/openmeetings/2011/ssamtg062211.htm" target="_blank">here</a>.  Hat tip to Doug Cornelius at Compliance Building for <a href="http://www.compliancebuilding.com/2011/06/09/finally-some-sec-action-on-the-july-21-deadline-for-fund-managers/" target="_blank">publishing this story</a> earlier today.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on June 22, 2011 at 10:00 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.</p>
<p>The subject matters of the Open Meeting will be:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Item 1: The Commission will consider whether to adopt new rules and rule amendments under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. These rules and rule amendments are designed to give effect to provisions of Title IV of the Dodd-Frank Act that, among other things, increase the statutory threshold for registration of investment advisers with the Commission, require advisers to hedge funds and other private funds to register with the Commission, and address reporting by certain investment advisers that are exempt from registration.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Item 2: The Commission will consider whether to adopt rules that would implement new exemptions from the registration requirements of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 for advisers to venture capital funds and advisers with less than $150 million in private fund assets under management in the United States. These exemptions were enacted as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The new rules also would clarify the meaning of certain terms included in a new exemption for foreign private advisers.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Item 3: The Commission will consider whether to adopt a rule defining “family offices” that will be excluded from the definition of an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.</p>
<p>At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.</p>
<p>For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:</p>
<p>The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.</p>
<p>Elizabeth M. Murphy</p>
<p>Secretary</p>
<p>June 8, 2011</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>Bart Mallon is an attorney with a practice focused on hedge funds and <a title="investment adviser registration" href="http://www.colefrieman.com" target="_blank">investment adviser registration</a>.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/sec-announces-open-meeting-on-hedge-fund-regulations.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In-Kind Contributions</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/in-kind-contributions.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/in-kind-contributions.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hedge Fund Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund in-kind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-kind contribution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/?p=4155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hedge Fund In-Kind Contributions Fund managers may allow investors to make &#8220;in-kind&#8221; contributions to the fund.  This means that instead of, or in addition to, a cash subscription, the manager may allow the investor to transfer securities or other assets to the fund in exchange for fund interests.  Both managers and investors [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Hedge Fund In-Kind Contributions</strong></p>
<p>Fund managers may allow investors to make &#8220;in-kind&#8221; contributions to the fund.  This means that instead of, or in addition to, a cash subscription, the manager may allow the investor to transfer securities or other assets to the fund in exchange for fund interests.  Both managers and investors should be aware of the tax consequences that arise from such transfers.  This post will provide an overview of the general rule and other issues which managers should be aware of with respect to future transactions after an in-kind contribution.  We always recommend that managers discuss the tax consequences of any in-kind contribution with tax counsel prior to the contribution and then with respect to any future disposition of the assets which were contributed.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Please note that tax issues are often complex and depend on the facts of a situation.  This post is intentionally general and you should not rely on this post with respect to any tax issue.  Please see our <a href="http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/disclaimer" target="_blank">disclaimer</a> and note we are not providing tax advice.</em></p>
<p><strong>General Rule</strong></p>
<p>For hedge fund investors, the general rule with respect to in-kind contributions is:</p>
<blockquote><p>a gain will be recognized on the transfer of stocks or securities to an “investment company” that results in “diversification” of that investor’s interests</p></blockquote>
<p>Please note that this is a two part test: the transfer must be</p>
<ol>
<li>to an &#8220;<em>investment company</em>&#8221; and</li>
<li>result in &#8220;<em>diversification</em>&#8220;</li>
</ol>
<p>If both parts of the test are not met then there will be no gain on the transfer.</p>
<p><strong>What is an &#8220;Investment Company&#8221;?</strong></p>
<p>The term &#8220;<em>investment company</em>&#8221; means an entity with more than 80% of the value of its assets consisting of certain properties including money, readily-marketable stocks or other equity interest, options, futures contracts, derivative financial instruments, and foreign currency.  The determination of whether an entity qualifies as an “investment company” is generally made immediately after the transfer of property.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Most hedge funds will qualify as an “investment company” using the 80% test.</em></p>
<p><strong>What is &#8220;Diversification&#8221;?</strong></p>
<p>The crucial test for investors is whether or not there is diversification with respect to a transfer.  Diversification happens if, at the time of the transfer (i.e. subscription to the fund), two or more investors transfer non-identical assets.  In most cases, the determination of whether diversification resulted is made immediately after the transfer of property.</p>
<p>In the following situations, there is generally no diversification:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">1.  No diversification if identical assets</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Example: Individuals A and B organize New Co with 100 shares of common stock.  A and B each contribute $500 worth of the only class of corporation X stock, listed on the NYSE, in exchange for 50 shares of New Co stock each.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">2.  No diversification if “insignificant amount of assets” transferred are non-identical</span>.  According to the IRS (in Treasury Regulations and various private letter rulings*), 1% and 5% of non-identical assets were insignificant, but 11% of non-identical assets was significant and resulted in diversification.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Example: Individuals A and B organize New Co with 100 shares of common stock. A contributes $990 worth of the only class of corporation X stock, listed on the NYSE, in exchange for 99 shares of stock.  B contributes $10 of readily-marketable securities in corporation Y in exchange for 1 share of New Co stock.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">3.  No diversification if all investors transfer a diversified portfolio of assets</span>.  The term “diversified portfolio of assets” means a portfolio in which not more than 25%  of transferred assets are invested in the stock or securities of one issuer and not more than 50% is invested in the stock or securities of five or fewer issuers.   Cash transfers are not included in these calculations.  There are also restrictions on the inclusion of government securities in these calculations.  Each investor to the transaction must transfer diverse portfolios.  If one transfers a non-diverse portfolio, all will be taxed on the gains.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Example: Individuals A and B organize New Co with 100 shares of common stock.  A and B each contribute $120 worth of the only class of corporation X stock, listed on the NYSE, in exchange for 12 shares of stock; $240 worth of the readily-marketable securities in corporations Y and Z in exchange for 24 shares of stock; and $140 worth of options in exchange for 14 shares of stock.</p>
<p><strong>Issues after an In-Kind Contribution</strong></p>
<p>Both the manager and investor should be aware of the potential tax consequences which follow from an in-kind contribution.  The following is a non-exclusive list of tax issues which the manager and investor should consider.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Allocation of Gains and Losses When the Fund Disposes of In-Kind Contributions</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">If the person making an in-kind contribution does not recognize taxable gains at the time of transfer, then what happens to the gains or losses once there is a disposition of the assets at the fund level?  In general, the fund will be required to first allocate the recognized gains and losses to the contributing investor and then pro rata to the other investors.  This allocation is required to account for the variation between the fund’s adjusted tax basis resulting from the in-kind contribution and the fair market value of those securities when they were contributed.  In essence, the contributing investor will pay the tax, but gets the benefit of the deferral.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Distributing the In-Kind Contributions</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">If the fund distributes a contributed security (which was not taxed at the time of contribution) to an investor other than the person who made the in-kind contribution anytime within 7 years of the contribution, such person will generally recognize the unrealized gain or loss at the time of the distribution.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Two Year Rule</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">If the fund makes a distribution of cash to a person who made an in-kind contribution simultaneously with or after the contribution, the contribution may be treated as if such person sold the securities to the fund for fair market value&#8211;resulting in recognized gain.   In fact the <a href="http://www.taxalmanac.org/index.php/Treasury_Regulations,_Subchapter_A,_Sec._1.707-3">Treasury Regulations</a> has established a rebuttable presumption about such a situation&#8211;if an person who made an in-kind contribution receives a distribution within 2 years after contributing securities, the distribution will be deemed to have been part of a disguised sale.  Such person can rebut the presumption by demonstrating that when it made the contribution, it did not intend to receive a distribution of cash in exchange or that the investment is subject to the appreciation or depreciation of the fund&#8217;s assets while invested.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>Cole-Frieman &amp; Mallon LLP provides comprehensive <a href="http://www.colefrieman.com" target="_blank">hedge fund formation </a>and other legal services.  Bart Mallon can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/in-kind-contributions.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NFA 2011 Annual Regulatory Reminder</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/nfa-2011-annual-regulatory-reminder.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/nfa-2011-annual-regulatory-reminder.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hedge Fund Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commodities and Futures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA annual compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA annual regulatory requirements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/?p=4315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this year we provided a general overview of the annual compliance requirements for CPOs and CTAs.  The NFA has just released their annual reminder for all CFTC registratants (including IBs, FCMs and RFEDs).  The NFA notice, reprinted below in full, provides a good overview of what CFTC registered firms [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this year we provided a general overview of the <a title="CPO and CTA annual compliance requirements" href="http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/nfa-annual-compliance-overview.html" target="_blank">annual compliance requirements</a> for CPOs and CTAs.  The NFA has just released their annual reminder for all CFTC registratants (including IBs, FCMs and RFEDs).  The <a title="nfa notice" href="http://www.nfa.futures.org/news/newsNotice.asp?ArticleID=3750" target="_blank">NFA notice</a>, reprinted below in full, provides a good overview of what CFTC registered firms need to be focusing on during the next month or so.</p>
<p>CFTC registered firms are reminded that now is a good time to review and revise their compliance manuals and complete the NFA self-examination process.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p><strong>Notice I-11-06</strong><br />
February 03, 2011</p>
<p><strong>Annual Regulatory Reminder</strong></p>
<p>National Futures Association has always been committed to providing our Members with the resources they need to meet their regulatory obligations as efficiently as possible. Therefore, we are providing you with an annual reminder regarding certain requirements that are not part of your day-to-day operations. This list does not capture all of your responsibilities for the upcoming year, but it should help remind you of certain non-routine requirements.</p>
<p>Within the next 12 months you will be required to:</p>
<ol>
<li>Complete the Annual Update process on the anniversary date of your firm&#8217;s registration. This process includes (1) completing the electronic Annual Registration Update; (2) electronically submitting the firm&#8217;s Annual Questionnaire on NFA&#8217;s website and (3) paying your annual registration fees and NFA dues.  Failure to satisfy all of the requirements in the annual update process within 30 days of your anniversary date will result in the withdrawal of your firm&#8217;s NFA registration and/or Membership. NFA&#8217;s BASIC system displays information reflecting whether or not firms are actively engaged in futures-related business activity or retail off-exchange foreign currency activities. If you commence operations, you should update your Questionnaire in order to change how your status is displayed in BASIC.</li>
<li>Complete NFA&#8217;s Self-Examination Checklist located on NFA&#8217;s website at http://www.nfa.futures.org/NFA-compliance/publication-library/self-exam-checklist.HTML.</li>
<li>Send your firm&#8217;s Privacy Policy to every current customer, client and pool participant (in addition to sending it to every new customer when the customer opens an account, enters into an advisory agreement, or purchases a subscription). For guidance in preparing your policy, please consult NFA&#8217;s Privacy Policy questionnaire (Appendix D of the Self-Exam Checklist).</li>
<li>Test your Disaster Recovery Plan and make any necessary adjustments. For guidance in preparing your plan, please consult NFA&#8217;s Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plan questionnaire (Appendix B of the Self-Exam Checklist).</li>
<li>Provide Ethics Training as outlined in your firm&#8217;s written Ethics Training Procedures. For guidance in developing your procedure, please consult NFA&#8217;s Ethics Training Policy questionnaire (Appendix C of the Self-Exam Checklist).</li>
<li>Supervise the operations of any Branch Offices, including conducting an annual onsite inspection of every Branch Office.</li>
</ol>
<p>If you are a registered <strong>Commodity Trading Advisor</strong>, you will also be required to:</p>
<ol>
<li>File any new exemption notices electronically through NFA&#8217;s Exemption System.</li>
<li>If soliciting new clients, distribute a Disclosure Document that is no more than 9 months old and that has been reviewed and accepted by NFA. Ensure that the document includes a complete business background and discloses all potentialconflicts of interest in accordance with NFA&#8217;s recent guidance. Disclosure Documents should be filed electronically throughNFA&#8217;s Disclosure Document System.</li>
<li>If placing bunched orders, analyze each trading program at least quarterly to ensure that the order allocation method has been fair and equitable and document this analysis.</li>
<li>The FCM that carries your client accounts will be contacting your clients to verify that the information obtained under NFA Compliance Rule 2-30(c) remains materially accurate, and provide the client with an opportunity to correct and complete the information. If the FCM notifies you of any material changes to the information, assess whether additional risk disclosure is required to be provided to the client based on the changed information.</li>
</ol>
<p>If you are a registered <strong>Commodity Pool Operator</strong>, you will also be required to:</p>
<ol>
<li>File any new exemption notices electronically through NFA&#8217;s Exemption System.</li>
<li>If soliciting new pool participants, distribute a Disclosure Document that is no more than 9 months old and that has been reviewed and accepted by NFA. Ensure that the document includes a complete business background and discloses all potential conflicts of interest in accordance with NFA&#8217;s recent guidance. Disclosure Documents should be filed electronically through NFA&#8217;s Disclosure Document System.</li>
<li>Update your CPO Questionnaire on NFA&#8217;s website for any pools that have liquidated.</li>
<li>Submit to NFA through NFA&#8217;s EasyFile system, and distribute to current participants, a certified Annual Report for each pool as of the close of the pool&#8217;s fiscal year. CFTC Regulations require Commodity Pool Operators to follow strict deadlines and filing requirements, and failing to meet those deadlines may result in a disciplinary action against a CPO. To learn more about EasyFile, go to NFA&#8217;s website and access the seminar at http://www.nfa.futures.org/NFA-compliance/NFA-education-training/webinars.HTML. Since NFA acts as the CFTC&#8217;s delegate when NFA receives and reviews Annual Reports, the reports are subject to requests under FOIA. CPOs may request confidential treatment of Annual Reports but must strictly follow the CFTC procedures contained in CFTC Regulation 145.9 for filing such requests. For information on how to request confidential treatment of Annual Reports filed with NFA, consult the information on NFA&#8217;s website at http://www.nfa.futures.org/NFA-compliance/NFA-commodity-pool-operators/cpo-confidential-treatment-requests.HTML.  When preparing pool Annual Reports, refer to the CFTC&#8217;s annual letter for useful tips.</li>
<li>Within 45 days after the end of each quarter, submit to NFA through NFA&#8217;s EasyFile system, a Pool Quarterly Report for each pool that you operate. Information required to be filed includes: (a) the identity of the pool&#8217;s administrator, carrying broker(s), trading manager(s) and custodian(s); (b) a statement of changes in net asset value; (c) monthly performance for the three months comprising the quarterly reporting period; and (d) a schedule of investments identifying any investment that exceeds 10% of the pool&#8217;s net asset value at the end of the quarterly reporting period.</li>
</ol>
<p>If you are a registered <strong>Introducing Broker</strong>, you will also be required to:</p>
<ol>
<li>Conduct Anti-Money Laundering (&#8220;AML&#8221;) training for relevant employees and complete an audit of your AML procedures and training. For guidance in developing your AML procedures, use NFA&#8217;s AML Procedures System.</li>
<li>The FCM that carries your customer accounts will be contacting your customers to verify that the information obtained under NFA Compliance Rule 2-30(c) remains materially accurate, and provide the customer with an opportunity to correct and complete the information. If the FCM notifies you of any material changes to the information, assess whether additional risk disclosure is required to be provided to the customer based on the changed information.</li>
<li>If you are not operating pursuant to a guarantee agreement, submit a certified annual report within 90 days after the firm&#8217;s fiscal year end. IBs that are also registered as Broker/Dealers (&#8220;BDs&#8221;) must submit the report within 60 days after the firm&#8217;s fiscal year end. IBs that are not also registered as BDs must file this certified statement via NFA&#8217;s EasyFile system.</li>
<li>If you are not operating pursuant to a guarantee agreement, submit semi-annual 1-FR-IB filings via EasyFile within 17 business days of the date of the statement (in addition to completing and maintaining monthly net capital computations). IBs also registered as BDs may file via WinJammer and must also file with NFA all statements required by FINRA. All financial statements should be prepared using the accrual basis of accounting as required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.</li>
</ol>
<p>If you are a registered F<strong>utures Commission Merchant</strong> or <strong>Retail Foreign Exchange Dealer</strong>, you will also be required to:</p>
<ol>
<li>Conduct Anti-Money Laundering (&#8220;AML&#8221;) training for relevant employees and complete an audit of your AML procedures and training. For guidance in developing your AML procedures, use NFA&#8217;s AML Procedures System.</li>
<li>Review your Point of Contact information for USA PATRIOT Act 314(a) information requests and notify NFA of any changes (FCMs only).</li>
<li>Supervise the operations of any GIBs, including conducting an annual onsite inspection of every GIB.</li>
<li>Contact active customers who are individuals, at least annually, to verify that the information obtained from that customer under NFA Compliance Rule 2-30(c) remains materially accurate, and provide the customer with an opportunity to correct and complete the information. If the customer notifies you of any material changes to the information, assess whether additional risk disclosure is required to be provided to the customer based on the changed information. However, if another FCM or IB introduces the customer&#8217;s account on a fully disclosed basis or a CTA directs trading in the account, then notify that Member of the changes to the customer&#8217;s information.</li>
<li>Submit a certified annual report within 90 days after the firm&#8217;s fiscal year end, or if your firm is also registered as a Broker/Dealer, within 60 days after the fiscal year end (in addition to submitting the firm&#8217;s monthly Focus II/I-FR-FCM with NFA via WinJammer).</li>
<li>For firms that offer off-exchange foreign currency futures and options contracts (FOREX) to retail customers, provide written information regarding NFA&#8217;s Background Affiliation Status Information Center (BASIC), including the website address to every current customer (in addition to sending it to every new customer when the customer opens an account).</li>
<li>For firms that offer FOREX to retail customers, review the security, capacity, credit and risk-management controls, and records provided by your electronic trading systems and certify that the requirements outlined in NFA Interpretive Notice 2-36(e) have been met. Prepare a certification, signed by a principal who is also a registered AP, and provide a hardcopy to NFA with the submission of your annual audited financial statement.</li>
</ol>
<p>If your firm or its clients trade <strong>security futures products</strong> (futures whose underlying instrument is either a single security or a narrow-based security index), consult NFA&#8217;s website for a comprehensive listing of your requirements athttp://www.nfa.futures.org/NFA-compliance/NFA-general-compliance-issues/security-futures-products.HTML.</p>
<p>We recommend that you keep this email as a reference guide to ensure that all requirements are completed on time throughout the year.</p>
<p><strong>We also want to remind you again</strong>: Every firm that is required to be registered as an FCM, RFED, IB, CPO or CTA in connection with its FOREX activity must be approved by NFA as a FOREX firm. NFA Members are prohibited from engaging in retail Forex transactions with these firms unless the firm has received this designation. In addition, FOREX firms must have at least one principal who is registered as an Associated Person (AP) and is approved as a FOREX AP. All individuals who solicit retail FOREX business or who supervise that activity must have taken and passed two exams &#8212; the National Commodity Futures Examination (Series 3) and the Retail Off Exchange Forex Examination (Series 34), which is a new exam focusing exclusively on Forex-related questions. However, individuals who were registered as APs, sole proprietors or floor brokers on May 22, 2008, do not need to take the Series 34 exam unless there has been a two year gap in their registration since that date.</p>
<p>As always, if you need assistance with these or any other NFA requirements, please contact NFA&#8217;s Information Center at (800) 621-3570.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p><span style="color: #111111; font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22px;">Cole-Frieman &amp; Mallon LLP provides comprehensive compliance and <a style="color: #2361a1; text-decoration: underline; padding: 0px; margin: 0px;" title="nfa compliance" href="http://www.colefrieman.com/" target="_blank">regulatory support for CTAs and CPOs</a>.  Bart Mallon, Esq. can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/nfa-2011-annual-regulatory-reminder.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEC Study on Uniform Fiduciary Duty for BDs</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/sec-study-on-uniform-fiduciary-duty-for-bds.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/sec-study-on-uniform-fiduciary-duty-for-bds.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hedge Fund Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hedge fund regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sec study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 913]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uniform fiduciary duty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/?p=4235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recommendation for Uniform Fiduciary Duty Under Section 913 of the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC was required to condict a study of the effectiveness of the current legal and regulatory structure for broker-dealer firms and investment advisory firms with respect to the provision of personalized investment advice to retail customers and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Recommendation for Uniform Fiduciary Duty</strong></p>
<p>Under Section 913 of the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC was required to condict a study of the effectiveness of the current legal and regulatory structure for broker-dealer firms and investment advisory firms with respect to the provision of personalized investment advice to retail customers and to comment on any gaps in the legal and regulatory structure.  Essentially Congress wants to know whether retail investors really understand the difference between BDs and IAs.  This issue has been one which many in the industry have strong opinions about, particularly from the investor side and the broker-dealer side.</p>
<p>The following is a brief overview of the SEC study which was recently released.</p>
<p><strong>SEC Recommendations</strong></p>
<p>In the study, the SEC spent considerable time providing a background and overview of the regulatory regimes of both investment advisers and broker-dealers.  The study also discussed retail investors and made many references to other studies which have been conducted on this and similar issues.  Ultimately, the SEC staff was trying to determine what standards should be in place with the understanding that retail investors may have limited understanding of the regulatory structure of IAs and BDs.</p>
<p>Overall, the SEC&#8217;s recommendations fall into two categories:</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>Uniform Fiduciary Standard</em></span> – SEC staff recommended that the SEC should apply a uniform fiduciary duty with respect to both IAs and BDs when such firms provide personalized investment advice regarding securities to retail custodmers [note: the fiduciary standard does not apply to brokers when they are activng in the capcity of a broker with respect to a transaction.]
<ul>
<li>With respect to the uniform standard, the staff noted that the SEC should provide guidance in some form with respect to implementing this standard.  Such guidance should cover, at least, the following items: standards of conduct, duty of loyalth, principal trading, duty of care, personalized investment advice about securities, and investor education.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>Harmonization of Regulations</em></span> – in general the SEC staff believes that harmonization, when it adds meaningful investor protection, would be advantageous.  Specifically, the staff discussed the following issues which potentially should have substantially similar rules/regulations for both IAs and BDs:
<ul>
<li>Advertising and other communications</li>
<li>Use of finders and solicitors</li>
<li>Solicitation</li>
<li>Licensing and registration of firms</li>
<li>Licensing and continuing education for representatives of BD and IA firms</li>
<li>Books and records</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>[Because of the complexity of the issue, the above is only a gross overview.]</p>
<p><strong>Our thoughts</strong></p>
<p>It seems clear that if two firms are engaged in the exact same activity with respect to retail investors (providing personalized investment advice regarding securities), then such firms should be subject to the same standards of care with respect to those activities.  However, it is also clear that implementing this change in regulatory framework will not be easy.Should be a bias toward harmonization when possible and practicle</p>
<p>What we found particularly interesting about the study  was the discussion about state registered investment advisers and the various rules they must adhere to – it seems funny that at the federal level we are trying to harmonize regulations, whereas the report makes clear that each states rules have completely different rules (see report starting at page 85).</p>
<p>Probably the most interesting thing is that the Staff recommended “that the Commission should consider requiring investment adviser representative to be subject to federal continuing education and licensing requirements.”  This means that the SEC  (or potentially a SRO) would be required to create and administer an exam (similar probably to the <a title="series 65 exam" href="http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/the-series-65-exam.html" target="_blank">Series 65 exam</a> for state registered investment adviser representatives) and continuing education (similar to the CE requirements for brokers).</p>
<p>The full report can be found here: <a href="http://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2011/913studyfinal.pdf" target="_blank">Study on Investment Advisers and Broker Dealers</a>.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>Bart Mallon provides legal advice to both investment advisers and broker-dealers through Cole-Frieman &amp; Mallon LLP, an <a title="investment management law" href="http://www.colefrieman.com" target="_blank">investment management law firm</a>.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/sec-study-on-uniform-fiduciary-duty-for-bds.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York LLC Publication Requirement</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/new-york-llc-publication-requirement.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/new-york-llc-publication-requirement.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 12:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hedge Fund Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY LLC Publication Requirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/?p=4079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fund sponsors who have established a limited liability company in New York to serve as the management company for their hedge fund should be aware of the New York publication requirement.  Pursuant to Section 206 of the New York Limited Liability Company Act, within 120 days after the effective date [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fund sponsors who have established a limited liability company in New York to serve as the management company for their hedge fund should be aware of the New York publication requirement.  Pursuant to Section 206 of the New York Limited Liability Company Act, within <span style="text-decoration: underline;">120 days</span> after the effective date of the initial articles of organization, a LLC must publish a copy of the articles of organization or a notice related to the formation of the LLC in two newspapers.  After publication, the sponsor will need to submit additional paperwork to the New York Department of Corporations to complete the publication requirement process.  This article provides an overview of the process as well as the consequences for not fulfilling the requirement.</p>
<p><strong>Publication in Newspapers</strong></p>
<p>The notice required under the act must be printed in two different newspapers once each week for six successive weeks.  The sponsor does not choose the newspapers in which the notice will be published; instead, the newspapers are predetermined for the LLC.</p>
<p>The first newspaper will be the same for all LLCs &#8211; the New York Law Journal.  [Information on the New York Law Journal to be forthcoming.]</p>
<p>The second newspaper will be different for each LLC.  In order to determine the second newspaper, the fund sponsor will need to <span style="font-size: 13.2px;">contact the county clerk of the county in which the LLC’s office is located (as stated in the articles of organization).  After the county clerk provides the sponsor with the information as to which newspaper to publish the notice, the sponsor will need to contact the newspapers for instruction on the manner in which to submit the materials for publication.</span></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Submitting the Certificate of Publication</strong></p>
<p>After the publication notices have run for six weeks in the two newspapers, the printer or publisher of each newspaper will provide the sponsor with an affidavit of publication.  The sponosor will then need to submit (1) a Certificate of Publication (2) the affidavits of publication of the newspapers, and (3) a filing fee of $50, to:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Department of State, Division of Corporations<br />
One Commerce Plaza<br />
99 Washington Avenue<br />
Albany, NY 12231</p>
<p><strong>Failure to Satisfy the Publication Requirement</strong></p>
<p>According to the law, if an LLC fails to satisfy this requirement, the LLC will be “suspended” from carrying on, conducting or transacting business in the state.  However, a suspension will not invalidate any contract or act of the LLC or the limited liability of the members.  It is therefore unclear exactly what “suspended” means, as the law and the courts have failed to elaborate.  In the future, the New York legislature or courts could institute more serious repercussions, such as the inability to open bank accounts or enter into certain transactions, but presently, the law explicitly states that a suspension does not invalidate the LLC’s contracts or acts and a suspension can be lifted if the LLC substantially complies with the publication requirement.</p>
<p>More information about the LLC publication requirement is available <a href="http://www.dos.state.ny.us/corps/llccorp.html" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/nycode/LLC/2/206" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p><!-- p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px 'Marker Felt'} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px 'Marker Felt'; min-height: 14.0px} -->Other related articles include:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="important hedge fund articles" href="http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/important-hedge-fund-articles.html" target="_blank">Important Hedge Fund Articles</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Bart Mallon, Esq. is a hedge fund attorney and provides <a title="hedge fund compliance" href="http://www.colefrieman.com" target="_blank">hedge fund compliance</a> services through Cole-Frieman &amp; Mallon LLP. He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/new-york-llc-publication-requirement.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rule 203(l)-1 &#8211; Definition of Venture Capital Fund</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/rule-203l-1-definition-of-venture-capital-fund.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/rule-203l-1-definition-of-venture-capital-fund.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hedge Fund Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hedge fund regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment adviser registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule 203(l)-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 203(l)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venture capital fund]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/?p=4044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEC Proposed Rule 203(l)-1 under Investment Advisers Act The SEC has proposed certain new rules as well as amendments to existing rules under the Investment Advisers Act as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act. New Advisers Act Section 203(l) provides an exemption from registration with the SEC to those groups [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SEC Proposed Rule 203(l)-1 under Investment Advisers Act</strong></p>
<p>The SEC has proposed certain new rules as well as amendments to existing rules under the Investment Advisers Act as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act. New Advisers Act Section 203(l) provides an exemption from registration with the SEC to those groups who only advise “venture capital funds,” without regard to the number of such funds advised by the adviser or the size of such funds.  The following proposed new rule 203(l)-1 essentially creates a definition of “venture capital fund” for the purposes of the new section.  The proposed rule also provides a grandfathering provision for certain presently existing venture capital funds.</p>
<p>For the purposes of Section 203(l)-1, the term “venture capital fund” will generally mean any private fund that:</p>
<ol>
<li>Represents it is a venture capital funds;</li>
<li>Invests in only equity securities of a portfolio company and 80% of such securities must have been acquired directly from the portfolio company;</li>
<li>Has a management company which provides guidance to the portfolio company regarding management and operations of the portfolio company or the fund must control the portfolio company;</li>
<li>Uses less than 15% leverage which may only be short term; and</li>
<li>Provides fund investors with no withdrawal rights except in extraordinary circumstances.</li>
</ol>
<p>The full proposed rule is reprinted below.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p><strong>§ 275.203(l)-1 Venture capital fund defined.</strong></p>
<p>(a) Venture capital fund defined. For purposes of section 203(l) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-3(l)), a venture capital fund is any private fund that:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(1) Represents to investors and potential investors that it is a venture capital fund;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(2) Owns solely:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(i) Equity securities issued by one or more qualifying portfolio companies, and at least 80 percent of the equity securities of each qualifying portfolio company owned by the fund was acquired directly from the qualifying portfolio company; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(ii) Cash and cash equivalents, as defined in § 270.2a51-1(b)(7)(i), and U.S. Treasuries with a remaining maturity of 60 days or less;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(3) With respect to each qualifying portfolio company, either directly or indirectly through each investment adviser not registered under the Act in reliance on section 203(l) thereof:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(i) Has an arrangement whereby the fund or the investment adviser offers to provide, and if accepted, does so provide, significant guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations or business objectives and policies of the qualifying portfolio company; or</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(ii) Controls the qualifying portfolio company;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(4) Does not borrow, issue debt obligations, provide guarantees or otherwise incur leverage, in excess of 15 percent of the private fund’s aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital, and any such borrowing, indebtedness, guarantee or leverage is for a non-renewable term of no longer than 120 calendar days;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(5) Only issues securities the terms of which do not provide a holder with any right, except in extraordinary circumstances, to withdraw, redeem or require the repurchase of such securities but may entitle holders to receive distributions made to all holders pro rata; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(6) Is not registered under section 8 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-8), and has not elected to be treated as a business development company pursuant to section 54 of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-53).</p>
<p>(b) Certain pre-existing venture capital funds. For purposes of section 203(l) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-3(l)) and in addition to any venture capital fund as set forth in paragraph (a), a venture capital fund also includes any private fund that:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(1) Has represented to investors and potential investors at the time of the offering of the private fund’s securities that it is a venture capital fund;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(2) Prior to December 31, 2010, has sold securities to one or more investors that are not related persons, as defined in § 275.204-2(d)(7), of any investment adviser of the private fund; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(3) Does not sell any securities to (including accepting any committed capital from) any person after July 21, 2011.</p>
<p>(c) Definitions. For purposes of this section,</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(1) Committed capital means any commitment pursuant to which a person is obligated to acquire an interest in, or make capital contributions to, the private fund.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(2) Equity securities has the same meaning as in section 3(a)(11) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(11)) and § 240.3a11-1 of this chapter.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(3) Publicly traded means, with respect to a company, being subject to the reporting requirements under section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), or having a security listed or traded on any exchange or organized market operating in a foreign jurisdiction.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(4) Qualifying portfolio company means any company that:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(i) At the time of any investment by the private fund, is not publicly traded and does not control, is not controlled by or under common control with another company, directly or indirectly, that is publicly traded;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(ii) Does not borrow or issue debt obligations, directly or indirectly, in connection with the private fund’s investment in such company;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(iii) Does not redeem, exchange or repurchase any securities of the company, or distribute to pre-existing security holders cash or other company assets, directly or indirectly, in connection with the private fund’s investment in such company; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(iv) Is not an investment company, a private fund, an issuer that would be an investment company but for the exemption provided by § 270.3a-7, or a commodity pool.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>Bart Mallon, Esq. is a <a title="hedge fund attorney" href="http://www.colefrieman.com" target="_blank">hedge fund attorney</a> and works with a variety of managers to hedge funds, private equity funds and venture capital funds.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/rule-203l-1-definition-of-venture-capital-fund.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rule 202(a)(30)-1 &#8211; Foreign Private Adviser Definition</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/rule-202a30-1-investment-advisers-act.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/rule-202a30-1-investment-advisers-act.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 07:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hedge Fund Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investment Advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hedge fund regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign private advisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment adviser registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule 202(a)(30)-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 202(a)(30)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/?p=4041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposed Rule 202(a)(30)-1 Pursuant to Dodd-Frank Act The SEC has proposed certain new rules as well as amendments to existing rules under the Investment Advisers Act as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act.  The following proposed new rule 202(a)(30), among other things, defines the terms “client” and “investor” for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Proposed Rule 202(a)(30)-1 Pursuant to Dodd-Frank Act</strong></p>
<p>The SEC has proposed certain new rules as well as amendments to existing rules under the Investment Advisers Act as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act.  The following proposed new rule 202(a)(30), among other things, defines the terms “client” and “investor” for the purposes of new Section 202(a)(30) of the Advisers Act which requires “foreign private advisers” to register with the SEC.</p>
<p>New section 202(a)(30) of the Advisers Act defines “foreign private adviser” as an investment adviser that</p>
<ul>
<li>has no place of business in the United States,</li>
<li>has fewer than 15 clients in the United States and investors in the United States in private funds advised by the adviser, and</li>
<li>less than $25 million in aggregate assets under management from such clients and investors.</li>
</ul>
<p>For the purposes of Section 202(a)(30)-1, a single “client” generally means:</p>
<ul>
<li>a natural person, family members of the same household and accounts for such persons</li>
<li>an entity and not the “owners” of an entity (two entities with exactly the same ownership can, together, be counted as a single client)</li>
</ul>
<p>Other rules with respect to the “client” definition:</p>
<ul>
<li>an “owner” will be deemed to be a client separate from an entity if advisory services are provided to the owner separately from the entity</li>
<li>managers to a hedge fund or other private fund do not necessarily need to count the individual investors in the fund as a client</li>
<li>a fund entity will be a client of the manager of the fund entity</li>
</ul>
<p>For the purposes of Section 202(a)(30)-1, the term “investor” will generally mean a “beneficial owner” (if the fund is a <a title="3c1 hedge fund" href="http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/section-3c1-hedge-funds.html" target="_blank">3(c)(1) fund</a>) or a “qualified purchaser” (if the fund is a <a title="3c7 hedge fund" href="http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/section-3c7-hedge-funds.html" target="_blank">3(c)(7) fund</a>).  With respect to any “client” or “investor,” the term “in the United States” generally means any person who is a deemed to be a &#8220;U.S. person&#8221; as it is defined in Rule 902(k) of Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933 (which is premised on residence in the United States, regardless of any temporary presence outside the United States).</p>
<p>The full proposed rule is reprinted below.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p><strong>§ 275.202(a)(30)-1 Foreign private advisers.</strong></p>
<p><em>(a) Client.</em> You may deem the following to be a single client for purposes of section 202(a)(30) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-2(a)(30)):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(1) A natural person, and:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(i) Any minor child of the natural person;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(ii) Any relative, spouse, or relative of the spouse of the natural person who has the same principal residence;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(iii) All accounts of which the natural person and/or the persons referred to in this paragraph (a)(1) are the only primary beneficiaries; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(iv) All trusts of which the natural person and/or the persons referred to in this paragraph (a)(1) are the only primary beneficiaries;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(2)</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(i) A corporation, general partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, trust (other than a trust referred to in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) of this section), or other legal organization (any of which are referred to hereinafter as a “legal organization”) to which you provide investment advice based on its investment objectives rather than the individual investment objectives of its shareholders, partners, limited partners, members, or beneficiaries (any of which are referred to hereinafter as an “owner”); and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(ii) Two or more legal organizations referred to in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section that have identical owners.</p>
<p><em>(b) Special rules regarding clients. </em>For purposes of this section:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(1) You must count an owner as a client if you provide investment advisory services to the owner separate and apart from the investment advisory services you provide to the legal organization, provided, however, that the determination that an owner is a client will not affect the applicability of this section with regard to any other owner;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(2) You are not required to count an owner as a client solely because you, on behalf of the legal organization, offer, promote, or sell interests in the legal organization to the owner, or report periodically to the owners as a group solely with respect to the performance of or plans for the legal organization’s assets or similar matters;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(3) A limited partnership or limited liability company is a client of any general partner, managing member or other person acting as investment adviser to the partnership or limited liability company; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(4) You are not required to count a private fund as a client if you count any investor, as that term is defined in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, in that private fund as an investor in the United States in that private fund.</p>
<p>Note to paragraphs (a) and (b): These paragraphs are a safe harbor and are not intended to specify the exclusive method for determining who may be deemed a single client for purposes of section 202(a)(30) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-2(a)(30)).</p>
<p><em>(c) Definitions.</em> For purposes of section 202(a)(30) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-2(a)(30)),</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(1) Investor means any person that would be included in determining the number of beneficial owners of the outstanding securities of a private fund under section 3(c)(1) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-3(c)(1)), or whether the outstanding securities of a private fund are owned exclusively by qualified purchasers under section 3(c)(7) of that Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-3(c)(7)), except that any of the following persons is also an investor:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(A) Any beneficial owner of the private fund that pursuant to § 270.3c-5 of this title would not be included in the above determinations under section 3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-3(c)(1), (7)); and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(B) Any beneficial owner of any outstanding short-term paper, as defined in section 2(a)(38) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(38)), issued by the private fund.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Note to paragraph (c)(1): You may treat as a single investor any person that is an investor in two or more private funds you advise.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(2) In the United States means with respect to:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(i) Any client or investor, any person that is a “U.S. person” as defined in § 230.902(k) of this title, except that any discretionary account or similar account that is held for the benefit of a person in the United States by a dealer or other professional fiduciary is in the United States if the dealer or professional fiduciary is a related person of the investment adviser relying on this section and is not organized, incorporated, or (if an individual) resident in the United States.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Note to paragraph (c)(2)(i): A person that is in the United States may be treated as not being in the United States if such person was not in the United States at the time of becoming a client or, in the case of an investor in a private fund, at the time the investor acquires the securities issued by the fund.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(ii) Any place of business, in the United States, as that term is defined in § 230.902(l) of this title; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">(iii) The public, in the United States, as that term is defined in § 230.902(l) of this title.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(3) Place of business has the same meaning as in § 275.222-1(a) of this title.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(4) Assets under management means the regulatory assets under management as determined under Item 5.F of Form ADV (§ 279.1 of this title).</p>
<p><em>(d) Holding out.</em> If you are relying on this section, you shall not be deemed to be holding yourself out generally to the public in the United States as an investment adviser, within the meaning of section 202(a)(30) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-2(a)(30)), solely because you participate in a non-public offering in the United States of securities issued by a private fund under the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a).</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>Bart Mallon, Esq. is a <a title="hedge fund attorney" href="http://www.colefrieman.com" target="_blank">hedge fund attorney</a> and providers legal services to hedge fund managers through Cole-Frieman &amp; Mallon LLP.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/rule-202a30-1-investment-advisers-act.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rule 203A-5 &#8211; IA Registration Transition Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/rule-203a-5-investment-advisers-act.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/rule-203a-5-investment-advisers-act.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 04:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hedge Fund Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investment Advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hedge fund regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ia registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 203A-5]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/?p=4036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposed Rule 203A-5 Pursuant to Dodd-Frank Act The SEC has proposed certain new rules as well as amendments to existing rules under the Investment Advisers Act as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act.  The following proposed new rule 203A-5 provides that (i) SEC registered investment advisers must report their AUM [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Proposed Rule 203A-5 Pursuant to Dodd-Frank Act</strong></p>
<p>The SEC has proposed certain new rules as well as amendments to existing rules under the Investment Advisers Act as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act.  The following proposed new rule 203A-5 provides that (i) SEC registered investment advisers must report their AUM to the SEC by August 20, 2011 and (ii) if such advisers are at that time below the threshold for SEC registration, the adviser must withdraw from SEC registration by October 19, 2011 (and generally be registered with the state in which the adviser’s maintains its principle office and place of business).</p>
<p>The full proposed revised rule is reprinted below.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p><strong>§ 275.203A-5 Transition rules.</strong></p>
<p>(a) Every investment adviser registered with the Commission on July 21, 2011 shall file an other-than-annual amendment to Form ADV (17 CFR 279.1) no later than August 20, 2011 and shall determine its assets under management based on the current market value of the assets as determined within 30 days prior to the date of filing the Form ADV.</p>
<p>(b) If an investment adviser registered with the Commission on July 21, 2011 would be prohibited from registering with the Commission under section 203A(a)(2) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-3a(a)(2)), and is not otherwise exempted by § 275.203A-2 from such prohibition, such investment adviser shall withdraw from registration with the Commission by filing Form ADV-W (17 CFR 279.2) no later than October 19, 2011. During this period while an investment adviser is registered with both the Commission and one or more state securities authorities, the Act and applicable State law will apply to the investment adviser’s advisory activities.</p>
<p>(c) If, prior to the effective date of the withdrawal from registration of an investment adviser on Form ADV-W, the Commission has instituted a proceeding pursuant to section 203(e) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-3(e)) to suspend or revoke registration, or pursuant to section 203(h) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-3(h)) to impose terms or conditions upon withdrawal, the withdrawal from registration shall not become effective except at such time and upon such terms and conditions as the Commission deems necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>Bart Mallon, Esq. is a <a title="hedge fund lawyer" href="http://www.colefrieman.com" target="_blank">hedge fund lawyer</a> and providers legal services to hedge fund managers through Cole-Frieman &amp; Mallon LLP.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/rule-203a-5-investment-advisers-act.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rule 203A-1 &#8211; Switching to or from SEC IA Registration</title>
		<link>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/rule-203a-1-investment-advisers-act.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/rule-203a-1-investment-advisers-act.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 03:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hedge Fund Lawyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investment Advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hedge fund regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge fund registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ia registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule 203A-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state registered investment adviser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/?p=4033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposed Rule 203A-1 Pursuant to Dodd-Frank Act The SEC has proposed certain new rules as well as amendments to existing rules under the Investment Advisers Act as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act.  The following proposed new rule 203A-1 will replace existing Rule 203A-1.  The new rule will provide state [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Proposed Rule 203A-1 Pursuant to Dodd-Frank Act</strong></p>
<p>The SEC has proposed certain new rules as well as amendments to existing rules under the Investment Advisers Act as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act.  The following proposed new rule 203A-1 will replace existing Rule 203A-1.  The new rule will provide state and SEC registered investment advisers with information on the time requirements for switching between the registration status.  The full proposed revised rule is reprinted below.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p><strong>§ 275.203A-1 Switching to or from SEC registration.</strong></p>
<p><em>(a) State-registered advisers—switching to SEC registration. </em>If you are registered with a state securities authority, you must apply for registration with the Commission within 90 days of filing an annual updating amendment to your Form ADV reporting that you are eligible for SEC registration and are not relying on an exemption from registration under sections 203(l) or 203(m) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-3(l), (m)).</p>
<p><em>(b) SEC-registered advisers—switching to State registration.</em> If you are registered with the Commission and file an annual updating amendment to your Form ADV reporting that you are not eligible for SEC registration and are not relying on an exemption from registration under sections 203(l) or 203(m) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-3(l), (m)), you must file Form ADV-W (17 CFR 279.2) to withdraw your SEC registration within 180 days of your fiscal year end (unless you then are eligible for SEC registration). During this period while you are registered with both the Commission and one or more state securities authorities, the Act and applicable State law will apply to your advisory activities.</p>
<p>****</p>
<p>Bart Mallon, Esq. runs the hedge fund law blog and provides <a title="hedge fund registration" href="http://www.colefrieman.com" target="_blank">hedge fund registration</a> and compliance services to managers through Cole-Frieman &amp; Mallon LLP.  He can be reached directly at 415-868-5345.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hedgefundlawblog.com/rule-203a-1-investment-advisers-act.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/48 queries in 0.124 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 808/926 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.hedgefundlawblog.com @ 2012-02-08 20:15:59 -->
